logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.02 2017고정253
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged shall not be transferred to another person;

Nevertheless, on December 26, 2016, the Defendant sent the 600,000 won and passwords of the Defendant’s corporate bank account (C) through Kwikset, under the condition that he would receive 10% of the amount of 60,000 won or 10% of the amount of deposit from the Defendant’s office located in the Defendant’s office located in the South,

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to the defendant.

2. According to the records of this case (such as the Defendant’s statement in the court and the detailed statement of the present case). ① On April 24, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million (No. 2017 high-ranking No. 1159) to a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and the above summary order became final and conclusive May 3, 2017; ② around December 24, 2016, the above summary order was issued to the Defendant’s husband’s community bank account (E) and sent the e-mail card to the needy party to whom the Defendant transferred the e-mail card, and ③ However, the Defendant transferred the e-mail card to the e-mail account other than the above D’s bank account, and the Defendant sent the e-mail card to Kwikkset as one of the above facts charged by the Defendant’s respective act of having access to each of the above facts charged on the 26.16.216.

It is reasonable to interpret (Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1530 Decided March 25, 2010). Therefore, it is already finalized.

arrow