beta
Text
1. Defendant B’s social welfare foundation: KRW 79,313,570 for the Plaintiff and its related amount from March 3, 2017 to June 26, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Social Welfare Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Social Welfare Association”) is concluded only by the Defendant Social Welfare Foundation B.
(2) Defendant C is a director of the Defendant Welfare Council on June 22, 2013, and a representative director of the Defendant Welfare Council on October 25, 2014, respectively, who was registered as the representative director of the Defendant Welfare Council at the time of March 1, 2015.
3) The Defendant Welfare Association, on January 7, 2015, publicly notified the employment of the head of the D Social Welfare Center (hereinafter “instant employment public notice”).
(4) The Plaintiff provided support in accordance with the Employment Notice and passed all the document screening and interview screening set forth in the notice.
5) On March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Welfare Association and the Plaintiff are D Social Welfare Center from March 1, 2015 to February 28, 2017 (hereinafter “instant Welfare Center”).
(2) A contract for the establishment of a facility (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”) to serve as the chief director.
(2) On March 3, 2015, the Defendant Welfare Association decided to appoint the Plaintiff as the director of the instant welfare center through a temporary directors meeting on March 3, 2015, and the Plaintiff was appointed as the director of the instant welfare center around that time. (b) On July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of board of directors, stating that “The Defendant Welfare Association refers to the Defendant Welfare Association in this case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case”).
(Case No.: Suwon District Court Branch Branch 2013Gahap1784). 2) On February 20, 2014, Suwon District Court rendered a judgment that “the resolution of the board of directors held by the Defendant on June 22, 2013 to appoint H is invalid,” and dismissed the part of the claim against Defendant C and IJKM. 3).