logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.29 2017가합5087
특허권침해금지 및 손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s patented invention is the representative director of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) who is engaged in the manufacture and sale of special automobiles, such as Lepers, and is the patent holder of the following patented invention (hereinafter “instant patented invention”).

1) The title of the invention: C2) Date of application / Date of registration / Patent number: The specification (20 pages) of the instant patent invention of this case stated “whether the case is subject to exceptions” and the fact that the said written application (Evidence A6) applied for exceptions on May 29, 2014 is recognized.

1.Definitions:

C. In the case of (iii) and (iv) prior inventions, they are inventions implemented later than the time when such prior inventions were subject to exceptions as above.

/ In the case of paragraph 1 of the claim(E/F 3) that is divided into pre-exer (FB) and post-exer (BB) to load cargo, and that the pre-exer and post-exer (S) can control the distance between pre-exer and post-exer (S) and expand the loading space, 10) ; 20 mpids (B) installed in the pre-exer (20 mpid) above to change the above height of the strawer; 20 mpids installed in the post-exer (20 mpid) above; 20 mpids (10 mpids) above to ensure that the 20 mpids were loaded above and above; 10 mpids (20 mpids) above to ensure that the 20 mpids were loaded on the ground; 30 mpids (20 mpids) above to ensure that the 20 mpidscers were loadeded (2) above.

arrow