The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in holding that the defendant is guilty of embezzlement among the facts charged in this case, violation of the Act on the AP's AP's AP's AP's AP's AP's violation of the Act on the AP Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes, fraud against AI, AL, BI, and C, forgery of each private document and use of the above investigation documents, violation of the Act on the AZ's AZ's AZ's AZ's AZ's violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes, violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment, violation of the Act on the Regulation of Illegal Check Control due to alteration of check, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal

In addition, considering various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court that sentenced KRW 13 years of imprisonment and KRW 30,000,000 to the Defendant is extremely unfair, even when considering the circumstances asserted by the defense counsel.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.