1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts to the effect that the Defendant is responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff, since the Plaintiff made telephone calls to the Plaintiff on April 10, 2013 and made verbal abuse and made verbal speech and threatened the Plaintiff.

2. In order for the tort liability to be established under Article 750 of the Civil Act, “an intentional or negligent act” should be recognized. The written evidence No. 1 (Recording) submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to deem the content of the Plaintiff’s speech that the Defendant had made a phone call to the Plaintiff as an “illegal act” against our legal order, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.