logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.01.18 2017가합397
위약금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 202,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from October 14, 2016 to October 18, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Since the Defendant’s indication of the claim violated the consignment contract for the operation of a school bus within and outside the city in 2016, it is as stated in the attached Form stating the purport of seeking penalty and payment of damages for delay as stipulated in the same contract.

2. According to Article 256(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, where the defendant contests the plaintiff's claim, he/she has a duty to submit a written answer within 30 days from the date of receiving a duplicate of the complaint.

Since the Defendant did not submit a written reply within 30 days after being served with the duplicate of the instant complaint, the Defendant shall be deemed to have led to the confession of the facts constituting the cause of the claim under Article 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the judgment shall be rendered without holding any pleadings, but only the matters necessary to specify the grounds for the claim in accordance with Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act

arrow