beta
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
1. As to the reasons for the public prosecutor’s appeal against Defendant A, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendant A of defamation among the facts charged in the instant case and acquitted Defendant A of the reasons for obstruction of duties due to refusal of labor on the ground that there was no proof of crime, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
The judgment below
In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of facts by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the grounds for rejection of illegality in Article 310 of the Criminal Act, the obstruction of business, and the obstruction of business.
2. As to the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor against Defendant C, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, deemed that there is no proof of crime, and, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, reversed the first instance judgment convicting Defendant C of the violation of defamation on May 15, 2012 among the charges modified in the instant case, and acquitted Defendant C of the violation of each of the duties on May 17, 2012; and on May 18, 2012; and assault, which is the primary charges, on May 22, 2012, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting Defendant C of the violation of defamation on May 14, 2012.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the allegation of false facts in the crime of abuse of authority, political party act, assault, property damage, and reputation damage, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the allegation of false facts in violation of logical and empirical rules.
3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.