The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Reasons for appeal

A. Even though the defendant did not have any intention to commit the murder, it would have affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the fact that the court below recognized the defendant's liability to commit the crime of attempted murder for the reasons stated in its holding

B. Although the Defendant, at the time of committing the instant crime, failed to have the ability to discern things or make decisions, the lower court erred by exceeding this ability and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

(c)

The punishment of the court below (7 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. 1) The Defendant asserted to the same effect as the lower court.

As to this, the court below, based on the evidence of its ruling, has taken the part of the victim's head directly connected to the life of the defendant several times with a view to 34 cm in total length, the degree of injury suffered by the victim, the defendant's attempt to return the victim who was used on the floor again to a view, and the defendant's own report of 112 on "Purrier" by reporting the defendant's own 112.

In full view of the fact that the Defendant did not accept the Defendant’s assertion on the ground that it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant had committed murder.

2) Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in comparison with the records, the lower court’s judgment is justifiable and acceptable. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts as alleged in the grounds of appeal and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment

subsection (b) of this section.

B. In light of the circumstances indicated in the record, such as the background leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s behavior at the time of committing the instant crime, and the circumstances after committing the instant crime, the Defendant’s main action at the time of committing the instant crime, etc.