logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.17 2015고단3417
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a business establishment engaging in similar acts with the trade name "C" in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 203.

On July 20, 2015, the Defendant received 70,000 won from D, which was found to be a customer at the above business establishment on July 16, 2015, and had E, an employee of the above business establishment, receive 50,000 won at the intervals of 50,000 won, and had E interfere with the act of similarity in a way of having the sexual organ of D by hand.

As a result, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by the aforementioned method from July 5, 2015 to July 20, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. A prosecutorial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant, D, or E;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. for facts constituting an offense and the grounds for sentencing under Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (from June to January and April) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older and the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic (the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic by business, giving and receiving prices, etc.) (no person subject to special sentencing];

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic shall be sentenced to a punishment against the defendant in light of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime, even though he/she had a record of being sentenced to a fine of five million won for the same crime, in light of the fact that he/she committed the instant crime, even though he/she had a record of being sentenced to a fine of five million won for the same crime.

However, the defendant has no record of punishment heavier than the suspension of execution, the size of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, operation period, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and other conditions of all kinds of sentencing as shown in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

arrow