1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendant’s Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd., and Defendant MBC, Il Young-young.

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the case is that the plaintiff asserted that he received a claim for damages in lieu of defect repair from the sectional owners who succeeded to the ownership of the building in partitioned ownership, and that he received a claim for damages in lieu of defect repair from the sectional owners who were sold in lots or succeeded to the ownership of the building in partitioned ownership, based on Article 9 of the Aggregate Buildings Act, Articles 667 through 671 of the Civil Act, and Article 46 (1) of the Housing Act (amended by Act No. 7520 of May 26, 2005) as the conjunctively, the plaintiff sought a payment of the damages for Defendant MFF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "MFF") who was the purchaser of the building in partitioned ownership, and sought a payment of the damages for the defect repair liability insurance contract or the defect repair liability insurance contract, which is the contractor of the building in partitioned ownership, in lieu of the defect repair liability in lieu of the above claim for damages.

The judgment of the court of first instance dismissed part of the plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant Shin Young-young, and dismissed the remainder of the lawsuit by receiving part of the plaintiff's claim against the defendants (the defendant Kim Young-young's 66,463,095 won, each of the above defendants' 309,559,856 won, each of the above defendants' 309,559,856 won, and damages for delay).

The plaintiff filed an appeal against the part of the part against the defendants against the defendants, which is part of the part against the defendant M&C, and the part against the defendant.

B. The premise fact-finding 【Evidence, without any dispute, Gap’s 1 through 9, Gap’s 11, 12, and Eul’s 1 through 5 are each numbers.