logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고합334
살인등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 18 years.

Of the facts charged in this case, the main building and fire prevention and attempted concealment of the dead body.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a staff member of the infinite factory, and his mother and her mother are similar to that of his her mother (78 years old) and became aware that her mother had come to the her mother's home for about two years before 2 years ago.

Around February 2016, the Defendant became unable to meet the rent of the said C house due to economic circumstances, and for about ten (10) days thereafter, the Defendant heard from the victim the phrase “Isk’s mother is to create a four-class system, whether Isn’s son is to have a four-class system, not to have a different distribution, and why Isn’s her son is not to have a ten-year percentage,” and the Defendant’s economic difficulty and ability was an insulting speech. As a result, there was a dispute, and this led to the Defendant’s economic difficulty and ability. However, the phone became the victim’s house, but the phone continued to contact after that call, and the victim’s talked that Is that I would play a part.

1. On June 16, 2016, around 21:18, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim’s house located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and Do floor with drinking water; (b) had talked at the victim’s house; (c) had her talked about the victim’s drinking in the manner of drinking alcohol; and (d) had her talked about the victim’s speech, such as “whether her mother is born under the same mother, why she would not have any way or why she would not walk; (c) had a dispute and a high son; and (d) the victim had her talked with the victim, she was boomed with the Defendant, etc., when she bucked with her own sound in front of her, and she had kiddd with the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s mind that she was working.

At around 21:58 on June 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) saw the horses, disputes, etc. of the Defendant, as seen above; (b) saw the horses, disputes, etc. of the Defendant; (c) saw the horses, disputes, etc. of the Defendant; (d) saw the horses, etc. from behind the victim, she was strokeed by the victim; and (d) saw the victim to cover the body of the victim.

arrow