The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The facts charged against the Defendant: (a) during the course of protesting against the victim for the reason that the Defendant was unable to receive the construction cost from the victim B (the age of 59) at the Japanese members of the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si around September 2017, the victim did not receive the telephone;

9. 6. 21:23 around 21:23: “Written reply to the end of the knife to be adjusted in good faith”; “I will get a telephone at 21:25 on the same day.”

9. 8. 13:21 on August 13:21 of the same year, text messages stating, “I am and find difficulties for delivery,” and around 17:07 on November 27, 197 of the same year, I am sent to the victim text messages stating, “I am or am dead. I am am sing off by the house of the width. I am am sing off. I am sing off. I am to the house of the width.” and around 17:37 on the same day, I am aware of the resident and the parking even if I am dead.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim over five times.

2. Provisions of applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: Judgment dismissing the victim's wish to punish after the prosecution is instituted under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act (written opinion received on December 23, 2019): Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.