logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.29 2017고단4909
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a CSP car.

On September 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on September 10:34, 2017, and turned to the left at the front of the new CD-ROMs Integrated Welfare Center at Sejong, and proceeded to the entrance of the above center parking lot.

At this point, the road leading to the entrance of the above center is connected to the parking lot, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found the victim D ( South, 34 years old) who was working to build a center on the road at which the width of the road was stored on the roadside due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure to do so, and tried the victim with the front and front wheels of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, 24 weeks in need of approximately 24 weeks in need of treatment, such as an incidental physical disorder, etc. due to the removal 4 times in need of treatment.

2. We examine the judgment. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records of this case, the victim can recognize facts that he expressed his intention not to be punished against the defendant on January 24, 2018, which is after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow