1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following “the part which is removed or added by February 2, 199,” and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

2. The judgment of the court of first instance on a part ranging from 7 lines to 7 lines 7 lines at the fifth to 6 lines of the judgment of the court of first instance on a height or addition

2.(c)

1) The parts of paragraphs (a) through (b) are as follows:

“A) The following facts are recognized in full view of the respective descriptions of the grounds for disciplinary action 1, 3(C) (related to the violation of the dignity, such as assault, insult, etc. against C) and the purport of the entire pleadings with respect to the testimony of a witness of the trial court L.

(A) With respect to the grounds for the first disciplinary action, the Plaintiff stated at a military police police unit that “C has a longer side head due to two fingers, considering the answer of work process related to the inspection of munitions and the report to the large ledger,” the Plaintiff stated that “C has a longer side head.”

(B) With respect to the grounds for the first disciplinary action, C stated at a military police unit that “The Plaintiff was spawning the head of his side head, leading approximately 6 meters to the front corridor in the front corridor in the direction and control room, leading approximately 6 meters to the front corridor in the front corridor, and the Plaintiff was spawning and spawning to the front corridor in the presidential police room.”

(C) With respect to the grounds for the third disciplinary action, C stated at a military police unit that “I am at the computer screen the reported data on the military field submitted by I am at L, and the Plaintiff reported this to the Plaintiff, and “I am at frien”.

(D) With respect to the grounds for the third disciplinary action, L of the trial witness stated in this Court that “At the time of review of the report data on the military field submitted by C, there was no C at the time of review, and there was a telephone call to C, and that there was an outside. At that time, the Plaintiff’s statement was “a frib and fribly,” and there was no desire.”

L also presents a written statement to a military police officer, "this w has been done in this form and added.