logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.10 2017고단3331
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is an employer who runs a personal construction business under the trade name of “D”, and the Defendant was working at the site located in Sejong-si from September 15, 2015 to January 22, 2016, and was retired from employment and did not pay KRW 235,000 for the wages of October 1, 2015, KRW 1,980,000 for the wages of December 2015; KRW 1,75,000 for the wages of December 1, 2015; KRW 5,030,000 for the total wages of KRW 5,00,000 for the wages of KRW 5,00 for the period from May 20, 2016 to KRW 30,50 for the retirement of KRW 30,50 for each of the parties’ retirement from employment at the site without an agreement to pay KRW 15,50,500 for each of the parties’ retirement.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 4595, the Defendant, as an employer operating K in Sejong-siJ, was employed from July 1, 2015 to February 28, 2016 by workers L, who worked from September 1, 2015 to February 28, 2016, did not pay a total of KRW 8,500,000 from the date of retirement within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of payment period between the respective parties.

2. Determination:

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 109 (2) and (1) of the Labor Standards Act;

B. Submission of each written agreement to the effect that workers F, I, and L do not want punishment to the defendant on May 8, 2018 and May 10, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, after the prosecution of this case,

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow