1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought revocation of the disposition of non-permission to peruse and copy documents entered in the separate sheet No. 1 and 2 as to the Defendant, and each document listed in the separate sheet No. 3 as to the documents listed in the separate sheet No. 3 as of August 20, 2015, and revocation of the disposition of non-permission to peruse and copy documents entered in the separate sheet No. 4 as of November 13, 2015. The court of first instance dismissed the part of the claim for revocation of the disposition of non-permission to peruse and copy documents entered in the separate sheet No. 3 as of October 20, 2015 among the documents listed in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, and 4 as to the instant lawsuit No. 5, and dismissed the claim for revocation of the disposition of non-permission to peruse and copy the remainder of the documents listed in the separate sheet No. 5 as to the aforementioned information.

Since only the defendant appealed against this, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the claim for revocation of the non-permission disposition on the remaining documents except for the non-disclosure information in attached Form 5 among the documents listed in the attached Table 1, 2, and

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, except for adding a judgment on the defendant's argument in the court of first instance under Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court's explanation of this case shall be

(1) The grounds alleged by the Defendant in the trial while filing an appeal are not significantly different from those alleged in the first instance court except for the claims under paragraph (3) below, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court are examined, the first instance court’s rejection of the Defendant’s assertion is justifiable. If the documents indicated in the first, second, and fourth list of the Defendant’s assertion of addition are excluded from the part corresponding to the attached non-disclosure information, the method and procedure of the investigation, such as the direction of investigation, transfer, work instruction, etc., and the police officer’s non-prosecution