Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) from Jun. 2, 2013 to Aug. 23, 2013, the Defendant: (b) operated the instant passenger car owned by the Defendant on the route back to the mother market located in the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, through the Gangnam-gu, via the Sunam-gu, to return to the mother market; (c) while operating the instant passenger car and the instant passenger car owned by the Defendant, while receiving the fare from the substitute driver to 1,00 to 3,000 won, the Defendant provided a private car for transportation at a cost.

2. Where several acts falling under the same name of crime or continuous acts are continuously conducted for a certain period under the single and continuous criminal intent, and the legal benefits from such acts are the same, all of them shall be punished as an inclusive crime (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do5370, Sept. 27, 2013). According to the records, the Defendant, on December 13, 2013, pursuant to the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 15953, “The Defendant, as the owner of this day or self-employed car, was provided with a single summary order of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00,00.).