logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.22 2017고단8101
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Central District Court on July 18, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 1, 2017.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by taking over any access medium shall take over any access medium used for electronic financial transactions from others;

Nevertheless, on January 8, 2016, the Defendant granted money from the non-bank Seoul (Seoul) and taken over the e-mail card, the e-mail card, the OTP card, etc. connected to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the limited company E (F) from D.

In addition, the Defendant, from around that time to around January 2016, took over the access media, such as physical cards and OTP cards connected to the total of seven accounts, such as the list of crimes in attached Table D.

2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by transferring any access medium shall transfer any access medium used for electronic financial transactions to any third person;

Nevertheless, on January 2016, the Defendant received money from a police officer in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "F") and transferred a physical crow card, an OTP card, etc. connected to the Nong AF account in the name of a limited company E (F).

In addition, the Defendant received money from around that time to Habman on January 2016, and transferred the physical card and the OTP card access media connected to the total of seven accounts, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's office protocol concerning D (includingG statements);

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Investigation report (verification of a transfer account), investigation report [Attachment of documents perused at the time of investigation of D or G], investigation report [specific purchase account A for purchase of accounts, such as H], investigation report [verification of additional transfer account], inquiry of customer information in the transferred account, etc.;

1. Court rulings (which shall be divided), 447 (Separation), 484 (Separation), 509 (Separation), 509 (Separation) from the Chuncheon District Court Decision 2017 High Court Order 447 (Separation), 484 (Separation

1. Previous convictions: The results of inquiry;

arrow