The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not constitute a crime of aiding and abetting 75 million won in collusion with A.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On June 29, 2012, Co-defendant A sent a text message to the victim D (the age of 52) with a Handphone. On the other hand, Co-defendant A sent the text message to Defendant B, who was at the right time known to him, and was in front of the Southern Police Station, and was in front of the Defendant B, who was at the right time known to him, and called Defendant B to the effect that he was raped with the victim B.

Accordingly, at around 15:40 on the same day, Defendant B left the victim's phone, "I am see that I am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am am. if I am am am am am, I am am am am am am am. I am am am am. I am am am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am am. I am am am, I am am am am, I am am, I am am. I am. I am am, I am am, I am. I am. I am am. I am am..............

At around 17:34 on the same day, A calls the victim, and around 17:34 on the same day, “A” refers to “A shall come to her parents who have come to her home and come to her home,” and Defendant B shall inquire about this day by the ’Woman’s house.

Along with a human body, I have been talked.