1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court’s explanation of this case is to delete 5 pages 5, 14, and 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the six pages 6 and less are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 4

2. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments and arguments as to the part to be used again, Eul evidence Nos. 6 through 10, Eul evidence Nos. 11 through 19 (including paper numbers) and the part to be used in this court's financial transaction information meetings against ASEAN Capital Co., Ltd., the plaintiff entered into an agreement for loans of 75 billion won in total from 1, 2008 one Capital Co.,, Ltd. for the purpose of raising funds for A new construction and parcelling-out business. At the time, Eul jointly and severally guaranteed the plaintiff's debt to Ga Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the wife owned 62,100 shares to 62,10 shares of the plaintiff Co., Ltd., Ltd., the second-class Capital Co.,, Ltd., Ltd., and the third-class pledge right to Ba Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and the third-class pledge right to Ba Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., which were issued to the above transfer pledge right.