A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 1969, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for special larceny, etc. at the Seoul District Court on June 12, 1992, and was sentenced to a imprisonment with prison labor for one year and a fine of one million won at the Seoul High Court on June 12, 199; on February 2, 199, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul District Court’s Northern Branch Branch on April 9, 2012; on August 31, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on January 24, 2013.

On June 8, 2013, at around 05:10 on June 8, 2013, the Defendant habitually stolen the property amounting to KRW 9.9 million in total at nine times, including the theft of the victim E on the floor in the gallon or water surface room located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, with a galthot 2 mobile phone equivalent to the market price of KRW 900,000,000,000, in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Reports on each occurrence of a theft;

3. Each statement of F, G, H, and I;

4. Records of cases of 1,000 won U.S. dollars, records of cases of 1,000 won U.S. dollars, and records of cases of

5. CCTV photographs, J rains, arrangement of the scene of crimes, investigation reports (investigation into such crimes), photographs of CCTV photographs, and investigation reports (on-site CCTV).

6. Investigation report (Attachment of case records in the U.S. file), investigation report (Attachment of investigation records in the same number of Acts and subordinate statutes with 0,000 won); investigation report (Attachment of case records in the Seoul Central Medium Department);

7. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of judgment, etc.);

8. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated in a planned manner;

1. Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act, comprehensively including relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment;

2. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;