The sentence against the accused shall be 5,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2017, at around 06:45, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle while drunkly under the influence of alcohol, such as sniffing and smelling the Defendant from CWD, while driving a B-crack-type cruise motor vehicle in the influence of alcohol at around 06:45, the Defendant driven the motor vehicle in the influence of alcohol.

Even though there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the person was requested to comply with the measurement of drinking at intervals of five minutes by inserting the whole part of a drinking measuring instrument three times at intervals of five minutes, he/she did not comply with the measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field photographs refusing measurement;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2 and 44 (2) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

The defendant currently has difficulties in maintaining his/her livelihood as a student.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant refused to comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method of crime.

The defendant has a record of receiving juvenile protective disposition due to drinking driving.