logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.07.03 2013고단191
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months at the Seoul Eastern District Court for fraud, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 10, 201.

1. The borrowing fraud Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim C, “Seoul and Seoul and is operating a computer security-related company; (b) paid money due to a tax investigation; (c) paid money; (d) the presidential election is completed; and (e) paid money to the victim C, who was dedicated to gathering mobile phones; and (d) paid money to the victim C, with the awareness of the victim; and (e) paid money.

On March 18, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim in Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, stating that “I will lend money to the victim in return for leaving the wall so that I will return it later.”

However, the defendant did not have real estate, but did not operate the company, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no certain occupation or income, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received 20,000 won from the victim as loan money from the victim, namely, from October 10, 2012 to the point of view that the clerical error in the indictment was corrected in accordance with the list of crimes in the attached Form No. 1. Until that time, the Defendant received 24,772,50 won in total from the victim through the same method, as in the list of crimes No. 1, as in the attached Form No. 1.

2. On April 18, 2012, the Defendant used a credit card issued in the name of the victim under the victim’s name by making a false statement to the victim C, stating that “I would use a credit card on the face of a week by creating one credit card.”

However, since the defendant did not have any property or income, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he used the credit card.

Accordingly, the defendant is the victim.

arrow