Text
The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jeonju District Court of Gwangju on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jung Eup prison on May 26, 2018.
1. Obstruction of business;
A. From around 10:00 on May 31, 2018 to 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the area around the permanent market located in North Korea-gun C; (b) was fluored by the victim’s “E”, and the victim’s “E”, who was operated by the victim D, said, read that “the victim would interfere with funeral services, and would vary to another place”; and (c) the victim interfered with the victim’s decentralization business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as bruing and threateninging the victim at a close time, thereby obstructing the victim’s decentralization business.
B. At the above date and time, the Defendant said that “G” operated by the Victim F in the above case that the victimized person in front of “G” refers to the Defendant “influence of a job,” thereby obstructing the Defendant’s business operation of the victim’s store by force by force by forcing the Defendant to avoid any disturbance, such as “fluence, the same year of weather, the same knife, and the knife knife,” and threatening the Defendant.
2. As indicated in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) was frightened in C, and 16:15 on the same day, she was forced to return home from the J, which was reported to the 112 B, before being called the “H” located in C; (b) was able to take a bath to the said J; and (c) was frighting the son’s face into his face and frighting the son’s son’s face into his son’s face; and (d) was frightened twice on the face.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's person;