The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The determination is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) led the Defendant to commit the instant crime; (c) posted the comments received from others on the Internet car page with no particular awareness of his mistake; and (d) did not seem to have a bad intent or bad faith; (c) deleted the comments immediately after the investigation; and (d) only had the previous convictions of fines for the instant species.

However, the crime of this case is deemed unfair because the defendant publicly stated the false facts about the victim, a former president, and the contents of the statement may seriously damage the social historical evaluation of the victim, and thus the nature of the crime is not good, and the bereaved family members of the victim seems to have suffered considerable mental suffering. In full view of the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, the process and result of the crime of this case, and various sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.