Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, who is known to the victims as an organization of violence to the vessel owners, masters, and divings, the victims, and to the victims, from September 201 to September 201, the management of the L fishing village fraternity's license site (O, area 75h) located in N in the fish farm in the field of fish and fish, on condition that the L fishing village fraternity's license site (O, area 75h) was received from the M of L fishing village fraternity members located in K from September 201, and Defendant B was delegated from October 201 to the management of the above L fishing village fraternity's license site (P, area 12hh) under the same conditions as the above M, respectively.

Around February 2, 2012, M entered into an event contract with L fishing village fraternity in Q’s name with a term of contract for the pertinent PP license within three years, and as the aforementioned license site and neighboring public waters form a new lighting, it applied for approval of the use of a fishing vessel for the extraction of the new lighting inside the aforementioned license site at the time of leisure on February 2, 2012, but the above application for approval was rejected on February 3, 2012, and thus, it was impossible to collect the new lighting from the above license site.

On the other hand, even if a licensee is a licensee, it is possible to collect a new light only within the licensed area, and in the public waters near the licensed area, it is legally prohibited to collect a new light. However, there was an illegal practice to collect a new light from the public waters near the license area under the name of the licensee to protect the license area. As such, the above application for the approval of the use of a fishing vessel with respect to the above P License was rejected, the above P License area was at the risk of excluding those who want to engage in the business of collecting a new light with a permit for diving fishery from the neighboring public waters near the above P License area, and to help them directly collect a new light or collect a new light.

The Defendants are victims R in these circumstances.