1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 29,655,813 and KRW 24,539,691 among them, from June 4, 2016 to the day of full payment.

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim (However, the creditor is the plaintiff, the debtor is the defendant) is not in dispute between the parties, or can be recognized in full view of the purport of Gap's entries and the whole arguments. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from June 4, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the day when the duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on the defendant as to the total amount of principal and interest of KRW 29,65,813, and principal amount of KRW 24,5

2. On the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant argued to the effect that since the defendant is scheduled to apply for individual rehabilitation including the plaintiff's above claim for takeover, it cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim. However, since the application for individual rehabilitation alone cannot affect the plaintiff's claim of this case, the defendant'

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.