logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.12.22 2016재나102
소유권보존등기말소 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (Plaintiff).

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the rationale for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (b) the facts stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases using “shall not be deemed to have existed further from 4.10 to 5.1; (c) so, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be quoted as is pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. (d) 2. Article 451(1)6 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “where documents and other articles used as evidence of the judgment were forged or altered,” as one of the grounds for retrial; and (d) Article 451(2) of the same Act provides that “when a judgment of conviction or judgment of imposition of a fine for negligence became final and conclusive, or when a final and conclusive judgment or a judgment of suspension of indictment was rendered for reasons other than lack of evidence, the grounds for admitting the final and conclusive judgment or for lack of evidence.”

arrow