1. The Defendant’s disposition of extending prohibition of departure against the Plaintiff on August 18, 2017 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff was a co-owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who owns the shares of No. 104-1/6, and participated as a member of the B shopping family association established to implement the B shopping district reconstruction project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant reconstruction project”).

C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) as an agent for implementing the instant reconstruction project (hereinafter “C”) was financed by the lender, such as the future Schosia Jeju Limited Liability Company (hereinafter “instant limited liability company”), with respect to the instant reconstruction project, and the Plaintiff and its members jointly and severally guaranteed the debt owed to the lender by C.

The Scco Engineering Co., Ltd., a contractor of the instant reconstruction project (hereinafter “Scco engineering”), completed new buildings and approved for use on February 4, 2013, but C was unable to repay loans to the instant limited liability company due to low sales price, and C acquired the right of the instant limited liability company after performing the duty to supplement funds agreed upon with the instant limited liability company.

Sc Engineering filed a lawsuit with the Seoul Central District Court for the payment of "the remainder after subtracting the proceeds from the sale of new buildings and the proceeds from the anticipated sale in the future from the unsold housing units from the original of the loan," with the performance of joint and several surety obligation against the plaintiff and its members, and on August 21, 2015, the above court sentenced on August 21, 2015 that the plaintiff et al. were jointly and severally liable to pay the amount of KRW 5,518,131,901 and the delay

(2014Gahap16901). On the other hand, 10 members of the reconstruction association, including the Plaintiff, registered a new construction and sale business of a building with the trade name "D", and the head of the Seocho District Tax Office imposed value-added tax on the newly built sale price on the members of the association and imposed value-added tax on the Plaintiff, who is a member of the association.

Plaintiff

The members are above.