logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고단877
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the building in CBL.

1. On January 27, 2013, around 19:30, the victim D (Woo 23 years old), the lessee No. 305 of the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, took advantage of the gap in attendance at a part-time part-time, opened an entrance and entered the entrance, and intrudes on the residence of the female.

2. On March 10, 2013, around 10:00, at the early 10:00, the Mwitco number was partitioned by a entrance without the consent of the victim E (the age of 23) who is the lessee, and entered the entrance and intruded into the dwelling of the female.

3. On March 12, 2013, around 12:00, the entrance door was opened without the consent of the victim D, such as the above paragraph 1, and the entrance was opened, and the entrance was invaded upon the residence of the female and the entrance into the entrance.

4. At around 17:30 on September 17, 2013, at the same place as above 17:30, the entrance was opened by dividing the master password without the consent of the victim E, and the entrance was intruded into the residence of the female.

5. From around 20:00 on September 17, 2013 to around 22:30 on September 22, 2013, the entrance was opened by dividing the master number without the consent of the victim E, and the entrance was intruded into the residence of the female and entered into the entrance.

6. On November 23, 2013, around 16:30, 201: (a) around 16:30, the Defendant opened an entrance by dividing the master number without the consent of the victim E, and entered the entrance into the entrance and intrudes on the residence of the female.

7. On December 3, 2013, around 13:58, 2013: (a) around 13:58, the victim was trying to open an entrance and enter the entrance without the consent of the victim, but the victim was unable to enter with the double locking device.

8. On the same day as above 7.00 day, at around 14:00, the defendant tried to open a 304 entrance door from the front corridor of the victim D, and the defendant tried to enter under 305 the victim's 304 entrance, such as assaulting the victim's loss and shoulder by hand when the victim met, and making it necessary to treat the victim for about 10 days.

arrow