The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court rendered a sentence by taking account of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crimes, and the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times of the same kind of crimes, etc., and taking account of the Defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., as well as the various sentencing conditions specified in the record

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.