A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium in using or managing the access medium, and the accused shall send a check card;

“To lend a loan by raising credit rating by setting up a trading performance on the face of the State” send a physical card, which is an access medium, to the nameless person.

The fact that the account linked to the card was investigated as a case used for the commission of the phishing fraud and was subject to a disposition on April 20, 2015 on the charge of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (insufficient evidence), and that the transfer of its access medium to another person was subject to punishment, and that the access medium sent as above can be used for the commission of the phishing fraud.

Nevertheless, on November 13, 2017, the Defendant would make a Masp passbook from a person in an influence to his/her name at the “C” office operated by the Defendant in the wife B in Young-si.

The phrase, “as it is necessary for computer work, the physical card and password change,” was heard, and a physical card, which is a access medium of C’s corporate bank account (D), was sent to the name influence and the account number and password were sent to the name influence.

As a result, the Defendant transferred the access media to a name-free person.

2. The Defendant sent a physical card as described in the above paragraph (1).

It is not only the enemy who was subject to a disposition that there was no suspicion, but also the body card sent to around November 13, 2017.

It was known that the account linked to the card was used for the commission of the phishing fraud, and that the account was used for the phishing fraud, and that the account was not actually used for the loan, but for the phishing fraud.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on January 4, 2018, assumes a false name or false representation of the National Bank E, “the Bank.”