logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.24 2015고단6324
허위감정등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, for Defendant B, for eight months, for Defendant C, and for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person in charge of overall management of the company affairs as the representative director of K, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "K") located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City J, and L is a K director who was appointed as a construction appraiser of the court and performed the appraiser's duties under the direction of Defendant A. The defendant B is a person who works in M professional offices until the end of April 2015, who was a majority of the court's construction appraiser's duties, and N was a person who assisted the above M's court's appraiser's duties at the above M office, and theO is a person who works in K director.

On the other hand, Defendant C is a certified architect who operates the " Q architect office" located in Busan-gu P, Busan-gu as a court appraiser and performed the work of appraiser. Defendant D is a person who operated the "S engineer office" located in Busan-gu R from March 25, 2012 and performed the work of the court appraiser, and T is a person who works as a S engineer office from May 27, 2015.

1. False appraisal in the name of appraiser L - The false appraisal (joint act with Defendant A, B, and N L) in the Changwon District Court No. 2965 at 2014 at 2965 at the Changwon District Court (joint act with Defendant A, Defendant B, and N) was selected on March 19, 2015 as appraiser for the construction cost case between Plaintiff U and Defendant V at 2965 at the Changwon District Court No. 309 at 2014 at 2014 at 2965 at 2965, and was ordered by the said division (the first civil division) to appraise the defective construction cost of the telecomed building in Gyeongnam-si.

In this regard, L only performed several simple cases of appraisal of housing defects, and as a collegiate panel of the case, L did not have an objective ability to conduct the above case requiring complex appraisal due to the difference of 13 interior rooms of the Moel building, etc., and as an enterprise specialized in the safety diagnosis, K as an enterprise specialized in the safety diagnosis, did not have any assistant to perform the construction appraisal work, and had experience in the appraisal execution.

arrow