The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant was actually hospitalized for a long time due to the need for medical treatment, not having received unnecessary hospitalized treatment to obtain insurance proceeds.

The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and three years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the record, the remainder of the facts charged in the instant case, excluding Nos. 21,40 (hereinafter “the part of innocence”) as indicated in the judgment below, is fully found guilty.

The defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts is without merit.

1) 피고인이 보험금을 청구한 보험사고( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 보험사고 ’라고 한다) 중 대부분은 ‘ 재해’ 이고, 그 중 원심 판시 별지 범죄 일람표 순번 10, 16 내지 19를 제외하고 모두 ‘ 주차 중 차에 접촉’, ‘ 집 앞 튀밥집 포장에 걸려 넘어 짐’, ‘D 병원에서 치료 중 넘어 짐’, ‘ 농협 가다가 넘어 짐’, ‘ 우리 은행 앞 튀밥 집에서 가방을 가지고 나오던 중 포장에 걸려 넘어 짐’, ‘ 집 마당에서 넘어 짐’, ‘ 집에서 넘어 짐’, ‘ 병원 화장실에서 넘어 짐’, ‘ 빙판길에서 넘어 짐’, ‘ 집 앞에서 발이 접혀서 넘어 짐’, ‘ 병원 가는 중에 넘어 짐’, ‘ 넘어 짐’ 등이다.

However, considering the fact that the defendant is a person with a disability of grade 3 (not being easy to move by himself), it is difficult to understand that the above accident occurred continuously and repeatedly from September 28, 2006 to October 29, 2013 as shown in the list of crimes (excluding the part of innocence in this case), and even if the occurrence of such accident itself is true, it is difficult to view it as an occurrence.