logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.05.04 2017나3133
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition as stated in Paragraph 2 below. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In addition, “No. 18 of the first instance judgment” in paragraph 4 of the fourth 10 of the first instance judgment shall be added to “No. 28 to 32.”

In the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment, the phrase “B No. 2” in attached Form 14 shall be added to the following:

Part 4 of the decision of the first instance court, the following shall be added to the phrase "no evidence exists" in Part 15.

In addition to the above facts of recognition, according to the results of the party appraiser R's preparation year and the written body appraisal, the part on the indication (97, 98, and 2005) of the account book (A1) submitted by the Plaintiff through the excessive melting experiment, the current and US geological examination, and the observation method by document-type writing-type format is presumed not to have been recently prepared, but to have been prepared at the time of each corresponding year, and each written statement is presumed to be excessive of a pen, and the excessive of each written pen. ② The witness of the first instance trial and Q of the first instance trial stated that "the land of this case is known to have been purchased from the J of the same village as the money received by the Plaintiff in Vietnam, and there is no statement that the Defendant sold it to the Defendant," the content of the alteration of rights in the guarantee certificate attached to the special provisions on the land of this case is not proved to be substantial truth."

3. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow