Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:00 on December 2, 2014, Defendant B expressed the victim J(56 years of age) who dices alcohol with G, H, and her husband at the F liquor located in Bocheon-si, G, and the victim J (56 years of age) who was in the next room presented her joint seat to G, and expressed the victim J expressed that “low sprinking sprinkling” was “nicking.e., the victim J.

G The Defendant, upon the victim J’s proposal, went back to a room where the victim J and the victim A(55 years of age) were followed by G along with H, and the victim J heard that the victim J’s “drawing” was “drawing.” The victim J heard the speech, and became a vision.

Accordingly, the Defendant gets the head of the victim A at one time due to an empty disease, which is a dangerous object on his/her table, and caused injury to the victim, such as the injury of NOS’s scamity in treatment days. The Defendant collected an empty disease, which is a dangerous object to the victim J's face, and caused injury to the victim, such as the damage of nOS’s scam that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), as mentioned above, caused the victim B (the victim’s 37 years of age) to go beyond one time, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as dynasium, tensions, etc. in which treatment is required for about three weeks, and caused injury to the victim, such as the victim’s dynasium and dynasium (the victim I (the victim I(38 years of age)’s dynasium on one occasion, which requires treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The witness B's testimony (for the defendant A);

1. The witness B and I consistently testified on the "the fact that the defendant A has inflicted an injury on them" of the witness I. The contents of the above testimony are specific and factual from the foundation of mutual dispute to the background of the dispute, as well as the injury part and degree of the victims recognized by each evidence as mentioned thereafter are also consistent with the contents of the above testimony, and HDoz.