The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the Defendant, and that the injury suffered by the victim of the instant traffic accident is relatively minor, and that the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and that the Defendant’s vehicle paid medical expenses and the insurance money in the name of the repair cost of the vehicle.

However, the Defendant had the record of having been sentenced to two times of imprisonment, three times of suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and two times of fine due to driving without a license, and in addition, the Defendant had been punished several times of traffic-related crimes. Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving without a license again, failed to take necessary measures to cause the instant traffic accident and escaped, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution due to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and failed to agree with the victim.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the lower court after the judgment of the lower court, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.