The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

The reason why our court's explanation about this case is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The Plaintiff asserts that the construction cost to be paid to the Defendant remains at least KRW 378,60,000,000,000, which was paid to the Defendant, even if the construction cost already paid was deducted, on the premise that the Defendant succeeded to the obligation under the instant construction contract even at least 2,217,292,66, based on the premise that the Defendant had succeeded to the obligation under the instant construction contract. However, it is insufficient to acknowledge the payment of the construction cost to the Defendant, but there is no other evidence, including the written evidence Nos. 32 and 33, which was submitted in the trial, and there is no other evidence. The Plaintiff asserts that the instant association and the Defendant constituted an emergency countermeasure committee and appointed H as the chairman in the statement of grounds for appeal. Even if following the argument, it is apparent that the Plaintiff’s appeal is separate from the instant association and the Defendant, and thus, the Plaintiff is dismissed, and the