All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendants guilty of the Defendant F’s H and I’s violation of trust from among the facts charged against the Defendants, and of the Defendants’ occupational embezzlement. In so doing, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the crime of violation of trust and occupational embezzlement.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. As such, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on Defendant G, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not legitimate

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.