All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant (1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are true when the victim’s face is faced, but did not neglect the victim’s face.

First of all, since the victim assaulted the defendant by plucking, plucking, etc., he did not report false facts.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and erroneous.

(2) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. (1) In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the fact that the defendant led the victim to be in light of the victim's right-hand snow and let the victim go beyond the floor and continued to go beyond the victim's face.

The judgment of the court below as to the injury shall not be deemed to have any error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding facts as alleged by the defendant.

(2) The court below rejected the above assertion in detail, on the ground that the defendant made a false accusation at the court below's decision, and on the third side of the decision, stated in detail the defendant's above assertion and its decision.

At the time of the instant case at the trial court, the Defendant stated that the victim plucked, plucked, and plucked up to X-ray photographing on November 14, 2018. According to the records of each of the medical records (Investigation Records 100, 101 pages), the first record of the instant case on November 14, 2018 on the part of the Defendant’s medical records was written.