1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 1, 2019, at around 23:05, the Plaintiff driven a two-wheeled vehicle BXP500A, and driven a one-lane B in front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, at a speed of about 40 km from active service to the North Asia's Community Security Center, and neglected the duty of Jeonju City, thereby neglecting the duty of Jeonju City, and received the victim D who cross the road to the right side on the left side of the road.

The Plaintiff, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered from the injury of the victim, such as a duplicating cuplic fus, which is in need of approximately five weeks of treatment, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

B. The Defendant is the Plaintiff.

On February 22, 2019, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not take necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victims of a traffic accident, as described in paragraph (1), the Plaintiff issued a revocation disposition of the driver’s license (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the part of the Plaintiff.

C. On March 25, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition. However, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on April 16, 2019.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff.

Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act were charged with regard to the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the bodily injury caused by escape), which committed a violation of Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes).

On May 16, 2019, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced the Plaintiff to the suspension of the execution of the above crime for 2 years in August, 2019, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 4 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The instant disposition is lawful.