The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The prosecutor asserts that the punishment of the court below (ten years of imprisonment, five years of suspended execution, three years of probation, three years of social service, 80 hours of social service) is too unfluent and unreasonable for reasons of appeal.

However, in full view of the various sentencing conditions cited by the court below, including the following: (a) the confession of the Defendant, the mistake of the Defendant, the victim’s criticism and disregarding the Defendant as a human being appears to have been committed; (b) the victim who used the Defendant appears to have made a certain mistake on the ground of the instant crime; and (c) the victim who sought the Defendant’s wife for this reason; (d) the Defendant sought a wife against the Defendant by hearing and spraying the horses of the victim; and (e) the Defendant’s wife who suffers from rare or incurable disease; (e) the Defendant’s wife and denial ought to be taken into consideration; and (e) the Defendant’s family and majority of employees, including the Defendant’s family members, have relatively relatively been publicly announced by family-social relationship, such as seeking the Defendant’s wife’s wife. In full view of the following factors, it cannot be said that the Defendant

We do not accept the prosecutor's assertion.

Since the prosecutor's appeal is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.