1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On August 6, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she leased the 2 through 11th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul building (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Defendant to August 6, 2012, 201 and the 670 million won rental deposit to August 5, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. The non-party company entered into the lease deposit to the defendant, and the non-party company's above lease deposit to the defendant.

(2) After the renewal of the lease contract of this case, the lease contract of this case was terminated on October 20, 2015. The plaintiff removed and relocated all of the plaintiff's facilities used by the building of this case on September 20, 2015, and the restoration and order was completed on October 2015, the defendant is not obligated to refund the lease deposit of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the lease deposit of this case and the damages for delay. 2. First of all, the judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: (a) whether the plaintiff has the right to claim the return of the lease deposit of this case to the defendant, and (b) No. 1, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 (including a serial number) can be recognized by adding the whole purport of arguments to the whole purport of arguments, but the right to claim the return of the lease deposit of this case is the non-party company that paid the lease deposit of this case, and the plaintiff has no right to claim the return of the lease deposit of this case (the plaintiff).