A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2013. 12. 16. 3:00경 불상의 장소부터 천안시 동남구 병천면 탑원리에 있는 ‘레이크팰리스’ 지하주차장까지 술을 마신 상태에서 B 스포티지 승용차를 운전하던 중 천안동남경찰서 C파출소 소속 경찰관 D으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 20분간에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았다.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to put the whole in a drinking measuring instrument, etc., and failed to comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the state of drinking drivers, report on the state of drinking drivers, and register on the use of drinking measuring instruments;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do134, Feb. 1, 201>

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of orders to provide community service and attend lectures;