The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of one million won imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. As to the grounds for appeal, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes and repents of mistakes, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victims, the mother’s burden of the expenses of a convalescent hospital, etc., and the fact that, on April 14, 2015, the sentence of obstruction of performance of official duties, which became final and conclusive for two years of suspension of execution, should be considered together with the case that a judgment is to be rendered simultaneously with the crimes of this case.

그러나 한편 피고인은 이 사건과 동종의 범죄로 여러 차례에 걸쳐서 처벌받은 전력이 있는 점, 하룻밤 사이에 두 곳의 주점에서 연이어 무전취식을 하는 등 죄질이 불량한 점, 벌금 200만 원의 약식명령을 받고 정식재판을 청구한 피고인에 대하여 이미 원심이 벌금을 100만 원으로 감액한 점, 그밖에 피고인의 연령, 성행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등을 비롯하여 형법 제51조에 정해진 양형의 조건을 살펴보면, 원심이 피고인에 대하여 선고한 형은 적절하고, 그 양정이 부당하다고는 보이지 않는다.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.