The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the statements of FF, G, I, J, and H, which were admitted as evidence of guilt, are inconsistent and inconsistent, and there is no evidence of probative value which makes a judge not more likely to have any reasonable doubt because of the conflict of interest and inaccurate credibility due to the lack of credibility, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts charged of this case, and the defendant did not interfere with the police officer's performance of official duties by failing to obstruct the police officer's taking pictures with handphones, unlike Co-defendant A, who is a co-defendant of the judgment of the court below, and attempted to take pictures with handphones, but the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of the facts charged of this case,

2. The Defendant asserted that he was not guilty as the grounds for appeal in the lower judgment. However, the lower court acknowledged the credibility of the statement of the persons involved in the instant case on the grounds of the same circumstance as the stated in the 7th parallel parallel 3 to 8th parallel 10 of the lower judgment.

In addition, the court below, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, stated that the defendant and A committed the same act as the facts charged at the time of this case consistent in the investigation agency and court of original instance; ② the defendant and A stated that they could not attach patrols even according to the statement of the defendant and A; ③ even according to the defendant's statement in the prosecutor's investigation process, the defendant's statement in the prosecutor's investigation process, ③ there was a blishing statement in the form of confusion; ④ the time when the police vehicle the defendant and A wanted to depart continued to have been 10 minutes; ④ the time when the defendant and A wanted to depart from the police vehicle continues to have been ever more than 10 minutes; and the defendant and A continue to interfere with the execution of official duties.