The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant acknowledged the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant reflects the depth of the instant crime.

2. The facts that the Defendant recognized the instant crime are favorable circumstances.

However, the crime of this case is due to the bad quality of the crime of driving without a drinking license in the condition of 0.122% at the new wall on the following day, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under the influence of alcohol in 2017, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under the influence of alcohol in 2017, and the crime of this case is not sufficient from the day when the above judgment became final and conclusive to the day when the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under the influence of alcohol in 2017, and there seems to be insufficient time, and the act of driving without a license for driving under the influence of alcohol must be strictly prohibited for the order of traffic on the road and the safety of women in traffic, and it does not seem that the defendant's punishment against the defendant is unfair due to the lack of circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.