logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2016.03.17 2014가합100967
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendants B, C, D, and E jointly share KRW 224,643,673, and Defendant F Co., Ltd. are the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant E, who is managing Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”), requested Defendant B, C, and D to attract investors in order to carry out the business of newly building and selling apartment houses (hereinafter “instant apartment houses”) on 1,816 square meters in Chungcheongnam-Nam G G (hereinafter “instant land”), and requested Defendant B, C, and D to attract investors. When attracting investment, Defendant B, and D would pay a total of KRW 100 million to them, and paid a fee of KRW 5 million per household, where the sale of the instant apartment units is carried out, and accordingly, Defendant B and D solicited the Plaintiff as an investor.

B. Defendant E is the principal of the instant loan amounting to KRW 500 million (hereinafter “instant loan principal”) between Defendant B and the actual agent of the Plaintiff on April 2011.

(3) The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective housing and the establishment of a collective

C. From April 13, 201 to June 1, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) delegated Defendant B to use KRW 500,00,000 in repaying the principal of the instant loan while paying a sum of KRW 500,00,00 with the investment deposit; and (b) Defendant B kept it, the said investment deposit should be used only for the redemption of the principal of the instant loan, which is the specified usage; (c) even if Defendant B, C, D, and E conspired to use the said investment deposit, between April 14, 201 and August 20, 2012, KRW 224,643,673 out of the said investment deposit, as interest (including interest at a delay) on the principal of the instant loan; and (d) expenses for the transfer registration of ownership of the instant land 25,250,000,000; and (d) Defendant E.

arrow