Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In Ischeon-si, the Defendant stated in B as “A corporation engaged in the sales agency business with the trade name,” and written indictment of 1,355 square meters in E, E, F 1,868 square meters in around September 29, 2014, but as at September 29, 2014, the size of E land (former) is 1,080 square meters in size, and the size of F land is 78 square meters in size, and its aggregate is 1,868 square meters in size, and as K and L are divided into “A” on September 14, 2015, the size of E land is 820 square meters in size, and F is 503 square meters in total, and the size is 1,323 square meters in size.

Land was awarded a successful bid in the auction of real estate.

1. On October 28, 2015, the Defendant would transfer part of the D’s land under the name of 50% of the shares in which he/she had 50% of the shares in the payment, if he/she fails to repay the money to the Victim G on or around October 28, 2015

“” and “one hundred million won was borrowed from the above victim.”

On December 12, 2016, the Defendant received a request from the victim G to transfer the land in the name of D in lieu of the repayment of the loan amount of KRW 100 million from the victim G, and the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, stating, “The victim would have changed the remainder of the land in excess of the documents necessary for the transfer of land ownership to the remainder of KRW 40 million.”

However, at the time of the defendant's share

D Of the land owned by E and F, approximately 661 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) out of the land owned by E and F was insufficient for the Defendant to transfer ownership to the Defendant’s name or to transfer ownership to the Defendant’s wife until the Defendant repaid the money borrowed from D’s wife, and thus, the Defendant was not able to transfer ownership to the Defendant’s wife up to the time. Therefore, there was no delegation from D to sell the instant land to the victim, and even if the Defendant received the remainder of KRW 13 million from the damaged party, there was no ability to transfer the ownership of the instant land.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received the remainder of KRW 13 million from the injured party.

2. The act of forging a private document and uttering a falsified investigation document;