A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment in the name of "C" in the name of "C," from 501, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

The Defendant, from March 2, 2012 to September 22, 2014, had six smugglings, beds, etc. in the above business establishment, had employed women engaged in sexual traffic, such as D and E, and received 1.30,000 won in return for sexual traffic from unspecified men who have found their places, and had them have sexual intercourse with male customers, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. A prosecutor's investigation report (report on calculation of criminal proceeds);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the control site, real estate lease contract, and business registration certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts and the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is that even though the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, there is considerable room for criticism in the sense that the crime of this case is re-compacted.

On the other hand, however, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the defendant is in profoundly against the mistake, the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a fine, the period, place, size, operating profit, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments.